Both Gemini Pro vs GPT 4 stand out as two of today’s most sophisticated AI solutions. These systems possess the remarkable ability to understand and engage with text, images, video, audio, and even code, offering a wide range of potential applications. Furthermore, they provide insights and capabilities that would require substantial resources to replicate with human expertise.
However, when deciding where to invest your time and efforts in learning, the choice between Gemini pro vs GPT 4 becomes pivotal. Which of these AI tools boasts superior capabilities?
Availability and Pricing
Both GPT-4 and Google Gemini are currently accessible in various forms. While Gemini Pro can be freely accessed via Bard, it has been accessible since December 6, 2023, and requires only a Google account for use. In contrast, GPT-4 is primarily available through the ChatGPT tool but requires a GPT-Plus subscription, priced at $20 per month.
Did you know that you can access GPT 3.5 (and, when available, GPT-4) through Microsoft’s Bing Chat? While there are some tools that offer limited access to GPT-4 for free, the primary way to use these powerful AI models is through ChatGPT.
It’s important to keep in mind that Gemini Pro, though effective, is not the final iteration of this AI technology. Google has announced plans for Gemini Ultra, which is expected to be the most advanced AI solution yet. Additionally, Google has launched Gemini Nano, a version that operates locally on certain smartphones. While Nano has a reduced feature set, it is primarily used for text summarization and proofreading tools.
Gemini and GPT-4 share many key features, making them versatile tools for various tasks. They can process text, images, videos, audio, and code, allowing for a wide range of interactions. For example, you can engage in general conversations, seek advice, analyze images, estimate crowd sizes in videos, or optimize code for efficiency.
While both AI can be extended with additional features, Google’s offerings for Gemini are somewhat limited compared to the wealth of third-party extensions available for GPT-4. Google’s extensions for Gemini include integration with Google Flights, Hotels, Maps, YouTube, and Workspace applications, enabling tasks such as document interaction and real-time flight and hotel information.
In contrast, GPT-4 boasts a vast array of third-party plug-ins, offering capabilities like shopping assistance, complex mathematical computations, integration with numerous apps, and even assistance with writing prompts. GPT-4 also allows for custom versions tailored to specific tasks, providing efficiency and continuity in conversations.
One notable feature of GPT-4 is its ability to generate images, thanks to its integration with Dall-E 3. Gemini, on the other hand, lacks this capability. However, Gemini has the edge in response time, delivering quicker replies compared to GPT-4, which can experience delays during peak usage times.
Both tools offer fact-checking mechanisms. GPT-4 provides source links for its claims, while Gemini allows users to perform Google searches for verification. These features enhance the credibility and reliability of the information provided by both AI.
Overall, while Gemini pro vs GPT 4 share many similarities, such as their ability to process various types of content, GPT-4 stands out for its extensive third-party extensions, customization options, and image-generation capabilities, while Gemini excels in terms of response time and integration with Google services.
Also Read | Download Youtube Videos Using These Easy Methods
Benchmark Scores – Gemini Pro vs GPT 4
General Reasoning and Comprehension
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Turbo | GPT-4 Turbo | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 81.9% | 80.48% | Multitask Language Understanding |
| Big-Bench Hard | 84.0% | 83.90% | Multi-step reasoning tasks |
| DROP | 78.9% | 83% | Reading comprehension |
| HellaSwag | 92.5% | 96% | Commonsense reasoning for everyday tasks |
Mathematical Reasoning
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Turbo | GPT-4 Turbo | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| GSM8K | 91.7% | 92.95% | Basic arithmetic and Grade School math problems |
| MATH | 58.5% | 54% | Advanced math problems |
Code Generation Of Gemini Pro vs GPT 4
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Turbo | GPT-4 Turbo | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| HumanEval | 71.9% | 73.17% | Python code generation |
| Natural2Code | 77.7% | 75% | Python code generation, new dataset |
Image Understanding
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Turbo | GPT-4 Turbo | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| VQAv2 | 73.2% | 77.2% | Natural image understanding |
| TextVQA | 73.5% | 78.0% | OCR on natural images |
| DocVQA | 86.5% | 88.4% | Document understanding |
| MMMU | 58.5% | 56.8% | Multi-discipline reasoning problems |
Video Understanding Gemini Pro vs GPT 4
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Turbo | GPT-4 Turbo | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| VATEX | 63.0% | 56.0% | English video captioning |
| Perception Test MCQA | 56.2% | 46.3% | Video question answering |
Audio Processing
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Turbo | GPT-4 Turbo | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| CoVoST 2 | 40.1% | 29.1% | Automatic speech translation |
| FLEURS | 6.6% | 17.6% | Automatic speech recognition |
Which is better, Gemini Pro vs GPT-4?
When Google introduced Gemini, it emphasized the superiority of its Pro model over GPT-4 in various AI applications and performance benchmarks, particularly in reasoning. However, validating these claims in practical scenarios presents significant challenges, as both AIs exhibit impressive performance when responding to prompts, be it text, images, video, or coding.
In my experience, both AIs have been valuable resources for querying game coding and function effectively as conversational chatbots. Nonetheless, Gemini seems programmed to avoid discussions or interactions involving images of specific individuals. It declined to identify the attire of a celebrity I presented, and when asked about myself, it provided minimal information. In contrast, GPT-4 did not encounter such limitations.
While I had the option to verify other responses using Google, Gemini did not utilize Google to gather information about me, as GPT-4 did with Bing. Furthermore, Gemini did not offer a fact-checking option.
Considering these factors, as of the current moment, GPT-4 appears to have an advantage. It is a more comprehensive tool, boasting enhanced capabilities through plug-ins and custom chatbots. While Gemini demonstrates comparable raw ability and rapid response times, it lacks the same extensive feature set. The potential of Gemini Ultra is considerable, but its impact will depend on the availability of this integration of Google’s AI.
To Wrap It Up
In conclusion, both Google’s Gemini pro vs GPT-4 represent cutting-edge AI solutions with impressive capabilities across various domains. Gemini’s Pro model offers strong reasoning abilities, while GPT-4 excels with its extensive third-party extensions and customization options. While Gemini shows promise, GPT-4 currently holds an edge with its feature set and accessibility. The choice between the two depends on specific needs and preferences, with both AI systems showcasing the remarkable potential of AI technology.
Leave a Reply